Relatives' Heartache Over Shoreline Degradation Endangering Norfolk Graves

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.

Cristian Wilkerson
Cristian Wilkerson

Environmental scientist and sustainable living advocate with over a decade of experience in eco-friendly practices.