🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are watching with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Momentum

Across Europe, a rising number of nations are exploring similar measures.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that smartphones and networks are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". Legislation could be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to shield young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "a potential options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has asked lawmakers to approve a bill increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has suggested a similar move, including an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to restrict their children from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if parental consent is provided. While it warns of the "addictive" design of these platforms, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a good foundation," stated one parliamentarian driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any policy must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the government pledged to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. An organization founded by the family of a young person who died after viewing disturbing platform posts suggests that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the social media companies to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for minors," stated a prominent peer.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, regulation is largely happening at the state level amid federal stalemate.

• The state of Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a bill barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law capping under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further access requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced laws requiring parental consent for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from various figures to copy Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Outlook

Apart from the West, additional states are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies take a more cautious position. A major UN agency has warned that social media bans carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The organization notes that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

As this global conversation continues, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries demonstrate that states globally are less and less willing to wait for the industry to self-regulate.